Citywide Zoning Text Amendments: “Gentle Density” at Scale (and Why It’s the New Power Tool)

The biggest housing reshuffles in America aren’t always announced with a flashy “rezoning map.” Increasingly, they arrive as something more technical—and more consequential: citywide zoning text amendments. These are rulebook rewrites that change what’s legal everywhere at once, turning “maybe, with a variance” into “yes, by-right” for small-to-mid intensity housing types.

That’s what “gentle density at scale” really means. Not a handful of tower sites. Not a few corridor upzonings. It’s the broad legalization of missing-middle supply—duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, cottage courts, ADUs, small-lot homes—through the text that governs every lot, block, and neighborhood.

And for developers, small operators, and capital allocators watching the housing cycle: text amendments are the new alpha signal—because they rewrite entitlements citywide, shift land values in slow motion, and move the bottleneck from “permission” to “execution.”

What a Citywide Text Amendment Actually Does

A citywide text amendment doesn’t just change where you can build; it changes what the rules mean across zoning districts. Think of it as updating the operating system, not the app.

In New York City, for example, “City of Yes for Housing Opportunity” is explicitly a citywide zoning text amendment intended to enable incremental additional housing across neighborhoods. In Portland, the Residential Infill Project changed residential rules broadly so more small multifamily types could pencil on lots that previously only delivered one house.  In Austin, the HOME amendments rework lot and subdivision rules to unlock “small-lot” outcomes in areas that historically produced large-lot single-family only. 

The common pattern: the city changes baseline permissions (units per lot, lot size, dimensional standards, parking, conversions) so that “gentle” housing forms become repeatable, financeable, and scalable.

Why This Wave Is Happening Now

Citywide text amendments are political judo. Instead of fighting block-by-block rezoning battles, a city changes the standards once, applies them widely, and tries to normalize incremental growth.

The pressure is obvious: housing shortages, affordability politics, and an infrastructure reality where pushing growth outward is expensive. But there’s also a quiet administrative truth: discretionary approvals are slow, uncertain, and increasingly litigated. Cities are trying to move housing production from hearings to standards—because standards can be engineered, staffed, and scaled.

You can see this in the way reforms are framed. New York State’s announcement around NYC’s City of Yes passage explicitly ties zoning reform to a multi-year housing production target (80,000 homes over 15 years) and infrastructure investment commitments.  Even in Minneapolis, the central story of the 2040 Plan era is that citywide reform can be delayed—or revived—through environmental review litigation and court rulings. 

Translation: the next decade of housing isn’t just “what’s allowed.” It’s “what survives the process—and what can actually be built.”

The “Gentle Density” Menu Cities Keep Legalizing

Most citywide text amendments don’t rely on one lever. They stack multiple small unlocks that compound:

They reduce minimum lot sizes (so a “starter-home geometry” becomes legal again), they legalize more units per lot, they expand ADUs, they relax or eliminate parking requirements where they act like density caps, and they make conversions easier (especially when offices, retail, or underused buildings can become housing without a bespoke rezoning fight.

Austin’s HOME Phase 2 is a clean illustration of how one technical change—allowing homes on lots as small as 1,800 square feet in specific single-family districts—can change the feasible product mix citywide.  Portland’s infill rules similarly expand the “how many homes can this lot hold?” question from 1 to 2–4 (and sometimes more with affordability). 

And sometimes it’s not just a city. State “middle housing” laws increasingly act like statewide text amendments that force local codes to comply (Washington’s HB 1110 is a prime example).

Working a gentle density pipeline in your city? Send us your market + target neighborhoods—OUM will feature the best “execution gap” case studies (and what actually penciled).

Subscribe for updates on corridors and opportunities.

Next Zoned for Opportunity Briefing